Observability of Latent States in Generative AI Models

25 Sept 2024 (modified: 04 Dec 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: LLM Observability, indistinguishability, meaning representation, feeling representation
TL;DR: Autoregressive Transformers with tokenized inputs and outputs, viewed a dynamical models, are observable. However, system prompts create indistinguishable trajectories that can be controlled by the provider and invisible to the user
Abstract:

We tackle the question of whether Large Language Models (LLMs), viewed as dynamical systems with state evolving in the embedding space of symbolic tokens, are observable. That is, whether there exist distinct state trajectories that yield the same sequence of generated output tokens, or sequences that belong to the same Nerode equivalence class ('meaning'). If an LLM is not observable, the state trajectory cannot be determined from input-output observations and can therefore evolve unbeknownst to the user while being potentially accessible to the model provider. We show that current LLMs implemented by autoregressive Transformers are observable: The set of state trajectories that produce the same tokenized output is a singleton, so there are no indistinguishable state trajectories. But if there are 'system prompts' not visible to the user, then the set of indistinguishable trajectories becomes non-trivial, meaning that there can be multiple state trajectories that yield the same tokenized output. We prove these claims analytically, and show examples of modifications to standard LLMs that engender unobservable behavior. Our analysis sheds light on possible designs that would enable a model to perform non-trivial computation that is not visible to the user, as well as on controls that the provider of services using the model could take to prevent unintended behavior. Finally, to counter the trend of anthropomorphizing LLM behavior, we cast the definition of 'feeling' from cognitive psychology in terms of measurable quantities in an LLM which, unlike humans, is directly measurable. We conclude that, in LLMs, unobservable state trajectories satisfy the definition of 'feelings' provided by the American Psychological Association, suitably modified to remove self-reference.

Primary Area: interpretability and explainable AI
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5215
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview