From Responsibility, via Indifference, to Recklessness

Published: 25 Sept 2024, Last Modified: 06 May 2025FEAREveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Formalisation, Responsibility, Agents
Abstract: The notion of ‘responsibility’ as a higher-level construct that dynamically impacts each agent’s goals, priorities and actions is very appealing, especially as humans regularly use such concepts in everyday reasoning. Our aim is to utilise `responsibility' to drive proactive \emph{computational} agent behaviour and, importantly, to highlight when an agent need \underline{not} do anything as well as when it should. In this work, we look at formalising responsibility, and especially how the concept of responsibility leads to goals or actions within our agents. We are also interested in hierarchies of responsibility. For example, even though responsible for some aspect our agent might decide to do nothing if it believes some other agent is \emph{more} responsible. We are also interested in the converse of responsibility -- an agent \emph{not} being responsible -- and want to also use this to drive agent behaviour. In particular, there may be different varieties of this ``lack of responsibility'' -- not just \emph{irresponsibility} but \emph{recklessness} and even \emph{maliciousness} that we also aim to formalise.
Submission Number: 3
Loading