Protein Language Models Enable Accurate Cryptic Ligand Binding Pocket Prediction

David A Bloore, Joseph Chahn Kim, Karan Kapoor, Eric Chen, Kaifu Gao, Mengdi Wang, Ming-Hong Hao

Primary Area: applications to physical sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, etc.)

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Keywords: Protein Language Models, Protein Binding Pockets, Protein Binding Sites, Cryptic Protein Binding Pockets

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

TL;DR: Protein Language Models enable cryptic protein-ligand binding pocket prediction that outperforms SOTA and offers a new tool for small molecule pharmaceutical discovery.

Abstract: Accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding pockets is a critical task in protein functional analysis and small molecule pharmaceutical design. However, the flexible and dynamic nature of proteins conceal an unknown number of potentially invaluable "cryptic" pockets. Current approaches for cryptic pocket discovery rely on molecular dynamics (MD), leading to poor scalability and bias. Even recent ML-based cryptic pocket discovery approaches require large, post-processed MD datasets to train their models. In contrast, this work presents ``Efficient Sequence-based cryptic Pocket prediction'' (ESP) leveraging advanced Protein Language Models (PLMs), and demonstrates significant improvement in predictive efficacy compared to ML-based cryptic pocket prediction SOTA (ROCAUC 0.93 vs 0.87). ESP achieves detection of cryptic pockets via training on readily available, non cryptic-pocket-specific data from the PDBBind dataset, rather than costly simulation and post-processing. Further, while SOTA's predictions often include positive signal broadly distributed over a target structure, ESP produces more spatially-focused predictions which increase downstream utility.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 6273