Internality and the internalisation of failure: Evidence from a novel task

Federico Mancinelli, Jonathan P. Roiser, Peter Dayan

Abstract: Author summary How success in tasks depends on our efforts is largely a feature of what is known as the controllability of the situation or environment. This quantity should determine the way we approach, adapt to, and perform tasks. In novel settings, it can only be our expectations about controllability that exert an effect, for instance determining the balance of our focus between features of achievability and potential reward; or affecting prior notions about what exactly is achievable or what we can or cannot do. All of these might be different between aversive and appetitive domains. To study these issues, we designed a novel task in which subjects have to learn about a new environment, and analyzed their behavior using a rich computational model. We found that expectations about controllability played a particularly important role in influencing learning, but in a way that differed between positive and negative outcomes. In particular, high expectations about controllability were tied to higher learning rates of unachievability given negative outcomes, guarding subjects from further loss, and preserving their subjective optimistic expectations about control. Our findings can be interpreted within a theoretical framework which implicates control expectations in individual learning differences, and fit well within modern theories of learning in aversive contexts and serotonergic function.