Is the Fairness Metric Truly Fair?

Haoze Jiang, Zunlei Feng, Jiacong Hu, Bingde Hu, Yi Wang, Huiqiong Wang, Yuanyu Wan, Mingli Song

Keywords: Fairness, Evaluation, Image Classification

Abstract: Image classification is a fundamental task in computer vision that has been widely adopted in critical applications such as face recognition and medical imaging, drawing considerable attention to its predictive fairness. Some researchers have proposed various fairness metrics and pipelines to enhance the fairness of deep learning models. However, recent studies indicate that existing fairness evaluation specifications and metrics have inherent flaws, as they focus on low-dimensional inputs, such as numerical data, and overlook partial correlations between target and sensitive attributes, leading to some degree of mutual exclusivity. This raises the question: Is the fairness metric truly fair? Through in-depth analysis, experiments conclude that the fairness of deep models is closely related to attribute sampling and the interdependencies among attributes. In this work, we address this challenge by introducing a new specification based on dynamic perturbation for image classification models. Specifically, we introduce an Attribute Projection Perturbation Strategy (APPS) that moves beyond the constraints of directly statistical discrete predictions by mapping sensitive attributes that may influence task attributes onto the same dimension for evaluation. Building on this, a Projection Fairness Metric System is proposed to quantifing the upper and lower bounds of fairness perturbations, examining and evaluating the impact of mapped sensitive attributes on the fairness of task predictions from different perspectives. Additionally, we conducted systematic evaluation experiments and extensive discussions, demonstrating that the proposed evaluation specification offers better objectivity and interpretability compared to existing metrics, in 24 image classification models including CNN and ViT architectures. It is hoped that this work will promote the standardization of fairness evaluation pipeline and metrics.

Primary Area: interpretability and explainable AI

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 7352