Shortcut Solutions Learned by Transformers Impair Continual Compositional Reasoning

TMLR Paper7667 Authors

Abstract: Identifying and exploiting common features across domains is at the heart of the human ability to make analogies, and is believed to be crucial for the ability to continually learn. To do this successfully, general and flexible computational strategies must be developed. While the extent to which Transformer neural network models can perform compositional reasoning has been the subject of intensive recent investigation, little work has been done to systematically understand how well these models can leverage their representations to learn new, related experiences. To address this gap, we expand the previously developed Learning Equality and Group Operations (LEGO) framework to a continual learning (CL) setting ("continual LEGO"). Using this continual LEGO experimental paradigm, we study the capability of feedforward and recurrent Transformer models to perform CL. We find that BERT, a canonical feedforward Transformer model, learns shortcut solutions that limits its ability to generalize and prevents strong forward transfer to new experiences. In contrast, we find evidence supporting the hypothesis that ALBERT, a recurrent version of BERT, learns a For loop-esque solution, which leads to better CL performance. When applying BERT and ALBERT models to a CL setting that requires composition across experiences, we find that both model families fail. Our investigation suggests that ALBERT models can have their performance drop rescued by use of training strategies that combine data across experiences, but this is not true for BERT models, where a detrimental shortcut solution becomes entrenched with initial training. Our results demonstrate that the recurrent ALBERT model may have an inductive bias better suited for CL and motivate future investigation of the interplay between Transformer architecture and computational solutions that emerge in modern models and tasks.

Submission Type: Regular submission (no more than 12 pages of main content)

Changes Since Last Submission:

We have addressed the major and minor comments raised by all 3 reviewers. In particular, we have:
1. Reduced the overly strong assertion that we have identified a For loop computation in ALBERT models.
2. Reduced the overly strong conclusions about recurrent vs. feedforward Transformer architectures, given our narrow scope (comparing only BERT and ALBERT).
3. Clarified our results on the composition across experiences task by removing the framing of them as a generative replay result.

Assigned Action Editor: ~Joao_Sacramento1

Submission Number: 7667