Divergence of Neural Tangent Kernel in Classification Problems

Published: 22 Jan 2025, Last Modified: 02 Apr 2025ICLR 2025 PosterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: neural tangent kernel, neural network, cross-entropy loss, classification problem
TL;DR: This paper investigates the divergence of NTK in fully connected and residual networks during classification tasks, showing that NTK theory is not applicable under the cross-entropy loss function as the empirical NTK fails to converge over time.
Abstract: This paper primarily investigates the convergence of the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) in classification problems. This study firstly show the strictly positive definiteness of NTK of multi-layer fully connected neural networks and residual neural networks. Then, through a contradiction argument, it indicates that, during training with the cross-entropy loss function, the neural network parameters diverge due to the strictly positive definiteness of the NTK. Consequently, the empirical NTK does not consistently converge but instead diverges as time approaches infinity. This finding implies that NTK theory is not applicable in this context, highlighting significant theoretical implications for the study of neural networks in classification problems. These results can also be easily generalized to other network structures, provided that the NTK is strictly positive definite.
Primary Area: learning theory
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 6965
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview