Abstract: Model collapse—a phenomenon where models degrade in performance due to indiscriminate use of synthetic data—is well studied. However, its role in bias amplification—the progressive reinforcement of pre-existing social biases in Large Language Models (LLMs)—remains underexplored. In this paper, we formally define the conditions for bias amplification and demonstrate through statistical simulations that bias can intensify even in the absence of sampling errors, the primary driver of model collapse. Empirically, we investigate political bias amplification in GPT-2 using a custom-built benchmark for sentence continuation tasks. Our findings reveal a progressively increasing right-leaning bias. Furthermore, we evaluate three mitigation strategies—Overfitting, Preservation, and Accumulation—and show that bias amplification persists even when model collapse is mitigated. Finally, a mechanistic interpretation identifies distinct sets of neurons responsible for model collapse and bias amplification, suggesting they arise from different underlying mechanisms.
Paper Type: Long
Research Area: Ethics, Bias, and Fairness
Research Area Keywords: bias/toxicity, human-in-the-loop, transparency, model bias/fairness evaluation, model bias/unfairness mitigation, ethical considerations in NLP applications, generalization, probing, data augmentation
Contribution Types: Model analysis & interpretability, NLP engineering experiment, Publicly available software and/or pre-trained models, Data analysis
Languages Studied: English
Submission Number: 242
Loading