NoveltyBench: Evaluating Creativity and Diversity in Language Models

Yiming Zhang, Harshita Diddee, Susan Holm, Hanchen Liu, Xinyue Liu, Vinay Samuel, Barry Wang, Daphne Ippolito

Keywords: generation, diversity, evaluation

TL;DR: We introduce a benchmark for creativity and diversity in language models.

Abstract:

Language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on standard benchmarks, yet they struggle increasingly from *mode collapse*, the inability to generate diverse and novel outputs.
Our work introduces **NoveltyBench**, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the ability of language models to produce multiple distinct and high-quality outputs.
NoveltyBench utilizes prompts curated to elicit diverse answers and filtered real-world user queries.
Evaluating 20 leading language models, we find that current state-of-the-art systems generate significantly less diversity than human writers.
Notably, larger models within a family often exhibit less diversity than their smaller counterparts, challenging the notion that capability on standard benchmarks translates directly to generative utility.
While prompting strategies like in-context regeneration can elicit diversity, our findings highlight a fundamental lack of distributional diversity in current models, reducing their utility for users seeking varied responses and suggesting the need for new training and evaluation paradigms that prioritize creativity alongside quality.

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the COLM Code of Ethics on https://colmweb.org/CoE.html

Author Guide: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://colmweb.org/AuthorGuide.html

Submission Number: 574