Pedestrian Motion Reconstruction: A Large-scale Benchmark via Mixed Reality Rendering with Multiple Perspectives and Modalities

Yichen Wang, Yiyi Zhang, Xinhao Hu, Li Niu, Jianfu Zhang, Yasushi Makihara, Yasushi Yagi, Pai Peng, Wenlong Liao, Tao He, Junchi Yan, Liqing Zhang

Keywords: Pedestrian Dynamics, Mixed Reality

TL;DR: a mix reality platform and a large-scale dataset to study pedestrian behavior

Abstract: Reconstructing pedestrian motion from dynamic sensors, with a focus on pedestrian intention, is crucial for advancing autonomous driving safety. However, this task is challenging due to data limitations arising from technical complexities, safety, and cost concerns. We introduce the Pedestrian Motion Reconstruction (PMR) dataset, which focuses on pedestrian intention to reconstruct behavior using multiple perspectives and modalities. PMR is developed from a mixed reality platform that combines real-world realism with the extensive, accurate labels of simulations, thereby reducing costs and risks. It captures the intricate dynamics of pedestrian interactions with objects and vehicles, using different modalities for a comprehensive understanding of human-vehicle interaction. Analyses show that PMR can naturally exhibit pedestrian intent and simulate extreme cases. PMR features a vast collection of data from 54 subjects interacting across 12 urban settings with 7 objects, encompassing 12,138 sequences with diverse weather conditions and vehicle speeds. This data provides a rich foundation for modeling pedestrian intent through multi-view and multi-modal insights. We also conduct comprehensive benchmark assessments across different modalities to thoroughly evaluate pedestrian motion reconstruction methods.

Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 8625