Analytic DAG Constraints for Differentiable DAG Learning

22 Sept 2023 (modified: 11 Feb 2024)Submitted to ICLR 2024EveryoneRevisionsBibTeX
Primary Area: causal reasoning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Keywords: DAG Learning, Causal Discovery, Structure Learning
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.
Abstract: Recovering underlying Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) structures from observational data presents a formidable challenge due to the combinatorial nature of the DAG-constrained optimization problem. Recently, researchers have identified gradient vanishing as one of the primary obstacles in differentiable DAG learning and have proposed several DAG constraints to mitigate this issue. By developing the necessary theory to establish a connection between analytic functions and DAG constraints, we demonstrate that analytic functions from the set $\\{f(x) = c_0 + \sum_{i=1}c_ix^i|c_0 \geqslant 0; \forall i > 0, c_i > 0; r = \lim_{i\rightarrow \infty}c_{i}/c_{i+1} > 0\\}$ can be employed to formulate effective DAG constraints. Furthermore, we establish that this set of functions is closed under several functional operators, including differentiation, summation, and multiplication. Consequently, these operators can be leveraged to create novel DAG constraints based on existing ones. Additionally, we emphasize the significance of the convergence radius $r$ of an analytic function as a critical performance indicator. An infinite convergence radius is susceptible to gradient vanishing but less affected by nonconvexity. Conversely, a finite convergence radius aids in mitigating the gradient vanishing issue but may be more susceptible to nonconvexity. This property can be instrumental in selecting appropriate DAG constraints for various scenarios.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5403
Loading