An X-Ray Is Worth 15 Features: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Radiology Report Generation

27 Sept 2024 (modified: 05 Feb 2025)Submitted to ICLR 2025EveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Radiology, Mechanistic Interpretability, Medical Imaging, Sparse Autoencoders
Abstract: Radiological services are experiencing unprecedented demand, leading to increased interest in automating radiology report generation. Existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) suffer from hallucinations, lack interpretability, and require expensive fine-tuning. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been shown to provide a principled approach to reverse-engineer a model's internal activations into discrete, verifiable components. Thus, we introduce SAE-Rad, the first instance of using mechanistic interpretability techniques explicitly for a downstream multi-modal reasoning task. SAE-Rad uses a novel SAE architecture to decompose latent representations from a pre-trained vision transformer into human-interpretable features. These features are then labelled using an off-the-shelf language model and compiled into a full report for each image, eliminating the need for fine-tuning large models for this task. On the MIMIC-CXR dataset, SAE-Rad achieves competitive radiology-specific metrics compared to state-of-the-art models while using significantly fewer computational resources for training. Qualitative analysis reveals that SAE-Rad learns meaningful visual concepts and generates reports aligning closely with expert interpretations. Our results suggest that SAEs can enhance multimodal reasoning in healthcare, providing a more interpretable alternative to existing VLMs.
Primary Area: applications to computer vision, audio, language, and other modalities
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 10926
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview