Self-Improving Robust Preference Optimization
Keywords: Preference optimization, direct alignment, reinforcement learning from human feedback, Self-refinement
Abstract: Online and offline $\mathtt{RLHF}$ methods, such as $\mathtt{PPO}$ and $\mathtt{DPO}$, have been highly successful in aligning AI with human preferences. Despite their success, however, these methods suffer from fundamental limitations: $\mathbf{(a)}$ Models trained with $\mathtt{RLHF}$ can learn from mistakes or negative examples through RL mechanism or contrastive loss during training. However, at inference time, they lack an innate self-improvement mechanism for error corrections. $\mathbf{(b)}$ The optimal solution of existing methods is highly task-dependent, making it difficult for them to generalize to new tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Self-Improving Robust Preference Optimization ($\mathtt{SRPO}$), a practical and mathematically principled offline $\mathtt{RLHF}$ framework. The key idea behind $\mathtt{SRPO}$ is to cast the problem of learning from human preferences as a self-improvement process, mathematically formulated as a min-max objective that jointly optimizes a self-improvement policy and a generative policy in an adversarial fashion. Crucially, the solution for this optimization problem is independent of the training task, which makes it robust to its changes. We then show that this objective can be reformulated as a non-adversarial offline loss, which can be efficiently optimized using standard supervised learning techniques at scale. To demonstrate $\mathtt{SRPO}$’s effectiveness, we evaluate it using AI Win-Rate (WR) against human (GOLD) completions. When tested on the XSum dataset, $\mathtt{SRPO}$ outperforms $\mathtt{DPO}$ by a margin of $\mathbf{15}$% after $5$ self-revisions, achieving an impressive $\mathbf{90}$% WR. Moreover, on the challenging Arena-Hard prompts, $\mathtt{SRPO}$ outperforms both $\mathtt{DPO}$ and $\mathtt{IPO}$ (by $\mathbf{4}$% without revision and $\mathbf{6}$% after a single revision), reaching a $\mathbf{56}$% WR against against $\mathtt{Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct}$.
Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 8503
Loading