Probing structural constraints of negation in Pretrained Language Models

David Kletz, Marie Candito, Pascal Amsili

Abstract:

Contradictory results about the encoding of the semantic impact of negation in pretrained language models (PLMs) have been drawn recently (e.g. Kassner and Schütze (2020); Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022)).
In this paper we focus rather on the way PLMs encode negation and its formal impact, through the phenomenon of the Negative Polarity Item (NPI) licensing in English.
More precisely, we use probes to identify which contextual representations best encode 1) the presence of negation in a sentence, and 2) the polarity of a neighboring masked polarity item.
We find that contextual representations of tokens inside the negation scope do allow for (i) a better prediction of the presence of "not" compared to those outside the scope and (ii) a better prediction of the right polarity of a masked polarity item licensed by "not", although the magnitude of the difference varies from PLM to PLM. Importantly, in both cases the trend holds even when controlling for distance to "not".
This tends to indicate that the embeddings of these models do reflect the notion of negation scope, and do encode the impact of negation on NPI licensing.
Yet, further control experiments reveal that the presence of other lexical items is also better captured when using the contextual representation of a token within the same syntactic clause than outside from it, suggesting that PLMs simply capture the more general notion of syntactic clause.

Student Paper: Yes, the first author is a student