Match made by BERT? Towards Interpretable Paper-Reviewer Assignments in NLPDownload PDF

Anonymous

16 Jan 2022 (modified: 05 May 2023)ACL ARR 2022 January Blind SubmissionReaders: Everyone
Abstract: Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching. Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached simply as an automated recommendation problem, rather than as a matter where different stakeholders (authors, reviewers, area chairs) have accumulated experience worth taking into account. We present the results of the first survey of the NLP community, identifying common issues and perspectives on what factors should be considered in paper-reviewer matching. This study contributes actionable recommendations for improving future NLP conferences, and desiderata for interpretable peer review assignments.
Paper Type: long
0 Replies

Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview