AI-Assisted Competency Assessment from Egocentric Video in Simulation-Based Nursing Education

Published: 13 May 2026, Last Modified: 13 May 2026CV4Edu - Computer Vision for Education (CVPR 2026)EveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: egocentric video, competency assessment, nursing simulation, few-shot action recognition
Abstract: Assessing learner competency in clinical simulation requires expert observation that is time-intensive, difficult to scale, and subject to inter-rater variability. While multimodal learning analytics has emerged as a promising direction, the contributions of individual modalities remain underexplored. We investigate what computer vision alone can reveal by proposing a three-stage framework that (1) extracts action timelines from egocentric nursing simulation video using frozen visual encoders and few-shot learning, (2) derives sequence-level features and per-session recognition metrics, and (3) relates these to instructor-rated competency. Across 22 densely annotated sessions (3.8 hours, 493 actions), a frozen DINOv2 backbone with HMM Viterbi decoding achieves 57.4\% MOF in leave-one-out 1-shot recognition. Surprisingly, we observe a negative trend between recognition accuracy and competency ($\rho = -0.524$, $p = 0.012$ for mIoU), robust to six confound controls: more competent students produce diverse, harder-to-classify workflows, while simple sequence features show no such relationship. Per-item analysis identifies patient safety protocols and team communication as the expected behaviors most reflected in this pattern, and process model comparisons reveal that high-competency students exhibit more protocol-consistent action transitions. These findings suggest that recognition accuracy may complement predicted action timelines as a pedagogically informative signal in automated competency assessment.
Email Sharing: We authorize the sharing of all author emails with Program Chairs.
Data Release: We authorize the release of our submission and author names to the public in the event of acceptance.
Track: Proceeding Track
Submission Number: 18
Loading