Using Semi-automatic Annotation Platform to Create Corpus for Argumentative Zoning

Alaa El-Ebshihy, Annisa Maulida Ningtyas, Florina Piroi, Andreas Rauber, Ade Romadhony, Said al Faraby, Mira Kania Sabariah

Abstract: Argumentative Zoning (AZ) is a tool to extract salient information from scientific texts for further Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, e.g. scientific articles summarisation. AZ defines the main rhetorical structure in scientific articles. The lack of large AZ annotated benchmark datasets along with the manual annotation complexity of scientific texts form a bottle neck in utilizing AZ for scientific NLP tasks. Aiming to solve this problem, in previous work, we presented an AZ-annotation platform that defines and uses four categories, or zones (Claim, Method, Result, Conclusion) that are used to label sentences in scientific articles. The platform helps to create benchmark datasets to be used with the AZ tool. In this work we look at the usability of the said platform to create/expand datasets for AZ. We present a annotation experiment, composed of two annotation rounds, selected scientific articles from the ACL anthology corpus are annotated using the platform. We compare the user annotations with a ground truth annotation and compute the inter annotation agreement. The annotations obtained in this way are used as training data for various BERT-based models to predict the zone of a given sentence from a scientific article. We compare the trained models with a model trained on a baseline AZ corpus.

External IDs:dblp:conf/ercimdl/El-EbshihyNPRRF23