ArchLock: Locking DNN Transferability at the Architecture Level with a Zero-Cost Binary Predictor

Tong Zhou, Shaolei Ren, Xiaolin Xu

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Keywords: Defense; DNN Transferability; Neural Architecture Search

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

Abstract: Deep neural network (DNN) models, despite their impressive performance, are vulnerable to exploitation by attackers who attempt to transfer them to other tasks for their own benefit. Current defense strategies mainly address this vulnerability at the model parameter level, leaving the potential of architectural-level defense largely unexplored. This paper, for the first time, addresses the issue of model protection by reducing transferability at the architecture level. Specifically, we present a novel neural architecture search (NAS)-enabled algorithm that employs zero-cost proxies and evolutionary search, to explore model architectures with low transferability. Our method, namely ArchLock, aims to achieve high performance on the source task, while degrading the performance on potential target tasks, i.e., locking the transferability of a DNN model. To achieve efficient cross-task search without accurately knowing the training data owned by the attackers, we utilize zero-cost proxies to speed up architecture evaluation and simulate potential target task embeddings to assist cross-task search with a binary performance predictor. Extensive experiments on NAS-Bench-201 and TransNAS-Bench-101 demonstrate that ArchLock reduces transferability by up to 30% and 50%, respectively, with negligible performance degradation on source tasks (<2%). The code is available at https://github.com/Tongzhou0101/ArchLock.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Primary Area: societal considerations including fairness, safety, privacy

Submission Number: 8804