Abstract: Highlights • Evaluation of 21 NLG systems of a wide variety of architectures: seq2seq and other data-driven, template- or rule-based. • Detailed evaluation with novel metrics: word-overlap-based, textual, systems' similarity, diversity (entropy), human ratings. • Seq2seq systems found to score higher than other architectures on word-overlap-based metrics and human-rated naturalness. • Seq2seq systems require a strong semantic control mechanism, otherwise they tend to misrepresent input semantics. • No NLG system matches human-produced texts in diversity. Abstract This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the first shared task on End-to-End Natural Language Generation (NLG) and identifies avenues for future research based on the results. This shared task aimed to assess whether recent end-to-end NLG systems can generate more complex output by learning from datasets containing higher lexical richness, syntactic complexity and diverse discourse phenomena. Introducing novel automatic and human metrics, we compare 62 systems submitted by 17 institutions, covering a wide range of approaches, including machine learning architectures – with the majority implementing sequence-to-sequence models (seq2seq) – as well as systems based on grammatical rules and templates. Seq2seq-based systems have demonstrated a great potential for NLG in the challenge. We find that seq2seq systems generally score high in terms of word-overlap metrics and human evaluations of naturalness – with the winning Slug system (Juraska et al., 2018) being seq2seq-based. However, vanilla seq2seq models often fail to correctly express a given meaning representation if they lack a strong semantic control mechanism applied during decoding. Moreover, seq2seq models can be outperformed by hand-engineered systems in terms of overall quality, as well as complexity, length and diversity of outputs. This research has influenced, inspired and motivated a number of recent studies outwith the original competition, which we also summarise as part of this paper.
0 Replies
Loading