Pairwise Elimination with Instance-Dependent Guarantees for Bandits with Cost Subsidy
Keywords: Bandits, Multi-Armed Bandits, Online Learning, Cost-Subsidy, Cost Subsidy, Improved UCB, UCB, Elimination Algorithms
TL;DR: Novel algorithm for the Multi-Armed Bandits with Cost Subsidy framework with logarithmic problem instance dependent upper bound
Abstract: Multi-armed bandits (MAB) are commonly used in sequential online decision-making when the reward of each decision is an unknown random variable. In practice, however, the typical goal of maximizing total reward may be less important than minimizing the total cost of the decisions taken, subject to a reward constraint. For example, we may seek to make decisions that have at least the reward of a reference ``default'' decision. This problem was recently introduced in the Multi-Armed Bandits with Cost Subsidy (MAB-CS) framework. MAB-CS is broadly applicable to problem domains where a primary metric (cost) is constrained by a secondary metric (reward), and there is an inability to explicitly determine the trade-off between these metrics. In our work, we first introduce the Pairwise-Elimination algorithm for a simplified variant of the cost subsidy problem with a known reference arm. We then generalize PE to PE-CS to solve the MAB-CS problem in the setting where the reference arm is the un-identified optimal arm. Next, we analyze the performance of both PE and PE-CS on the dual metrics of Cost and Quality Regret. Our instance-dependent analysis of PE and PE-CS reveals that both algorithms have an order-wise logarithmic upper bound on Cost and Quality Regret, making our policy the first with such a guarantee. Finally, experiments are conducted using the MovieLens 25M dataset for both PE and PE-CS and using a synthetic toy experiment for PE-CS revealing that our method invariably outperforms the ETC-CS baseline from the literature.
Primary Area: reinforcement learning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 4514
Loading