Bad Habits: Policy Confounding and Out-of-Trajectory Generalization in Reinforcement Learning

21 Sept 2023 (modified: 11 Feb 2024)Submitted to ICLR 2024EveryoneRevisionsBibTeX
Supplementary Material: pdf
Primary Area: reinforcement learning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Keywords: reinforcement learning, generalization, confounding, spurious correlations, state abstraction
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.
TL;DR: This paper characterizes policy confounding, a phenomenon by which agents develop habits that rely on spurious correlations between observations and rewards that are induced by their own policies.
Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents may sometimes develop habits that are effective only when specific policies are followed. After an initial exploration phase during which agents try out different actions in the environment, they eventually converge on a particular policy. At this point, the distribution over state-action trajectories becomes narrower, leading agents to repeatedly experience the same transitions. This repetitive exposure can give rise to spurious correlations. Agents may then pick up on these correlations and develop simple habits that only work well within the specific set of trajectories dictated by their policy. The issue here is that these habits can result in incorrect outcomes if agents are forced to deviate from their typical trajectories due to changes in the environment or in their policies. In this paper, we provide a mathematical characterization of this phenomenon, which we refer to as policy confounding, and show, through a series of examples, when and how it occurs in practice.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 3210
Loading