Nandao-Qs: When Suprise Sparks Inquiry

Published: 07 Feb 2025, Last Modified: 23 Apr 2025WCCFL 2025 posterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Question Bias, Polar Question Particle, Evidential Modification, Rhetorical Question
TL;DR: A paper about a discourse marker that encodes unexpected evidence in Mandarin Chinese
Abstract: This paper investigates the semantics and pragmatics of nandao-Qs in Mandarin, focusing on their evidential properties. While previous studies have treated nandao as a biased question word or a rhetorical device (Alleton 1988, Gong 1995, Xu 2012, 2017), I argue that nandao- Qs encode evidential signals and reflect the speaker’s confrontation with unexpected contextual evidence. Drawing on insights from the Kernel-based framework from Von Fintel & Gillies (2010), this paper demonstrates that nandao-Qs highlight an incompatible Kernel, representing an epistemic conflict that arises from either disbelief or unopinionatedness. Furthermore, using the decision-theoretic account proposed by Van Rooy & Safarova (2003), I explore how the so- called public bias in nandao-Qs can be derived through pragmatic reasoning. Finally, I examine the relationship between nandao-Qs and rhetorical questions, establishing that while nandao creates an environment conducive to rhetorical interpretation, it does not inherently constitute a rhetorical question. This analysis offers a unified account that integrates previous approaches and sheds light on the broader discourse functions of nandao, particularly in conveying incredulity (Jing-Schmidt 2008) and managing epistemic states.
Submission Number: 38
Loading