On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inferenceDownload PDF

Published: 31 Oct 2022, 18:00, Last Modified: 06 Oct 2022, 11:05NeurIPS 2022 AcceptReaders: Everyone
Keywords: Bayesian Neural Networks, Variational Bayes, Variational Inference, Invariance, Symmetry, posterior collapse
TL;DR: Invariances in the likelihood of over-parametrised models such as neural networks complicate the structure of the posterior by introducing additional modes that can not be approximated by mean-field distributions.
Abstract: Variational Bayesian posterior inference often requires simplifying approximations such as mean-field parametrisation to ensure tractability. However, prior work has associated the variational mean-field approximation for Bayesian neural networks with underfitting in the case of small datasets or large model sizes. In this work, we show that invariances in the likelihood function of over-parametrised models contribute to this phenomenon because these invariances complicate the structure of the posterior by introducing discrete and/or continuous modes which cannot be well approximated by Gaussian mean-field distributions. In particular, we show that the mean-field approximation has an additional gap in the evidence lower bound compared to a purpose-built posterior that takes into account the known invariances. Importantly, this invariance gap is not constant; it vanishes as the approximation reverts to the prior. We proceed by first considering translation invariances in a linear model with a single data point in detail. We show that, while the true posterior can be constructed from a mean-field parametrisation, this is achieved only if the objective function takes into account the invariance gap. Then, we transfer our analysis of the linear model to neural networks. Our analysis provides a framework for future work to explore solutions to the invariance problem.
Supplementary Material: pdf
12 Replies

Loading