Toward Fail-Safe Speaker Recognition: Trial-Based Calibration With a Reject Option

Luciana Ferrer, Mahesh Kumar Nandwana, Mitchell McLaren, Diego Castán, Aaron Lawson

Abstract: The output scores of most of the speaker recognition systems are not directly interpretable as stand-alone values. For this reason, a calibration step is usually performed on the scores to convert them into proper likelihood ratios, which have a clear probabilistic interpretation. The standard calibration approach transforms the system scores using a linear function trained using data selected to closely match the evaluation conditions. This selection, though, is not feasible when the evaluation conditions are unknown. In previous work, we proposed a calibration approach for this scenario called trial-based calibration (TBC). TBC trains a separate calibration model for each test trial using data that is dynamically selected from a candidate training set to match the conditions of the trial. In this work, we extend the TBC method, proposing: 1) a new similarity metric for selecting training data that result in significant gains over the one proposed in the original work; 2) a new option that enables the system to reject a trial when not enough matched data are available for training the calibration model; and 3) the use of regularization to improve the robustness of the calibration models trained for each trial. We test the proposed algorithms on a development set composed of several conditions and on the Federal Bureau of Investigation multi-condition speaker recognition dataset, and we demonstrate that the proposed approach reduces calibration loss to values close to 0 for most of the conditions when matched calibration data are available for selection, and that it can reject most of the trials for which relevant calibration data are unavailable.