Support and Centrality: Learning Weights for Knowledge Graph Embedding ModelsOpen Website

2018 (modified: 27 Sept 2024)EKAW 2018Readers: Everyone
Abstract: Computing knowledge graph (KG) embeddings is a technique to learn distributional representations for components of a knowledge graph while preserving structural information. The learned embeddings can be used in multiple downstream tasks such as question answering, information extraction, query expansion, semantic similarity, and information retrieval. Over the past years, multiple embedding techniques have been proposed based on different underlying assumptions. The most actively researched models are translation-based which treat relations as translation operations in a shared (or relation-specific) space. Interestingly, almost all KG embedding models treat each triple equally, regardless of the fact that the contribution of each triple to the global information content differs substantially. Many triples can be inferred from others, while some triples are the foundational (basis) statements that constitute a knowledge graph, thereby supporting other triples. Hence, in order to learn a suitable embedding model, each triple should be treated differently with respect to its information content. Here, we propose a data-driven approach to measure the information content of each triple with respect to the whole knowledge graph by using rule mining and PageRank. We show how to compute triple-specific weights to improve the performance of three KG embedding models (TransE, TransR and HolE). Link prediction tasks on two standard datasets, FB15K and WN18, show the effectiveness of our weighted KG embedding model over other more complex models. In fact, for FB15K our TransE-RW embeddings model outperforms models such as TransE, TransM, TransH, and TransR by at least 12.98% for measuring the Mean Rank and at least 1.45% for HIT@10. Our HolE-RW model also outperforms HolE and ComplEx by at least 14.3% for MRR and about 30.4% for HIT@1 on FB15K. Finally, TransR-RW show an improvement over TransR by 3.90% for Mean Rank and 0.87% for HIT@10.
0 Replies

Loading