Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks
Keywords: Jailbreaking, adversarial attacks, adversarial robustness, AI safety
TL;DR: We show how to jailbreak basically all leading frontier LLMs with 100% success rate.
Abstract: We show that even the most recent safety-aligned LLMs are not robust to simple *adaptive* jailbreaking attacks. First, we demonstrate how to successfully leverage access to *logprobs* for jailbreaking: we initially design an adversarial prompt template (sometimes adapted to the target LLM), and then we apply random search on a suffix to maximize a target logprob (e.g., of the token *``Sure''*), potentially with multiple restarts. In this way, we achieve 100\% attack success rate---according to GPT-4 as a judge---on Vicuna-13B, Mistral-7B, Phi-3-Mini, Nemotron-4-340B, Llama-2-Chat-7B/13B/70B, Llama-3-Instruct-8B, Gemma-7B, GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, and R2D2 from HarmBench that was adversarially trained against the GCG attack. We also show how to jailbreak *all* Claude models---that do not expose logprobs---via either a transfer or prefilling attack with a *100\% success rate*. In addition, we show how to use random search on a restricted set of tokens for finding trojan strings in poisoned models---a task that shares many similarities with jailbreaking---which is the algorithm that brought us the *first place* in a recent trojan detection competition. The common theme behind these attacks is that *adaptivity* is crucial: different models are vulnerable to different prompting templates (e.g., R2D2 is very sensitive to in-context learning prompts), some models have unique vulnerabilities based on their APIs (e.g., prefilling for Claude), and in some settings, it is crucial to restrict the token search space based on prior knowledge (e.g., for trojan detection).
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 1621
Loading