ZARA: Improving Few-Shot Self-Rationalization for Small Language Models

Wei-Lin Chen, An-Zi Yen, Cheng-Kuang Wu, Hen-Hsen Huang, Hsin-Hsi Chen

Submission Type: Regular Long Paper

Submission Track: Interpretability, Interactivity, and Analysis of Models for NLP

Keywords: free-text explanation, rationale, self-rationalization

TL;DR: This work improves few-shot self-rationalization for small LMs via self-training with a novel zero-shot rationale-answer augmentation strategy.

Abstract:

Language models (LMs) that jointly generate end-task answers as well as free-text rationales are known as self-rationalization models.
Recent works demonstrate great performance gain for self-rationalization by few-shot prompting LMs with rationale-augmented exemplars.
However, the ability to benefit from explanations only emerges with large-scale LMs, which have poor accessibility.
In this work, we explore the less-studied setting of leveraging explanations for small LMs to improve few-shot self-rationalization.
We first revisit the relationship between rationales and answers.
Inspired by the implicit mental process of how human beings assess explanations, we present a novel approach, Zero-shot Augmentation of Rationale-Answer pairs (ZARA), to automatically construct pseudo-parallel data for self-training by reducing the problem of plausibility judgement to natural language inference.
Experimental results show ZARA achieves SOTA performance on the FEB benchmark, for both the task accuracy and the explanation metric.
In addition, we conduct human and quantitative evaluation validating ZARA's ability to automatically identify plausible and accurate rationale-answer pairs.

Submission Number: 2423