Automatically predicting user ratings for conversational systems

Giuliano Tortoreto, Alessandra Cervone, Evgeny A. Stepanov, giuseppe riccardi

Abstract: Automatic evaluation models for open-domain conversational agents either correlate poorly with human judgment or require expensive annotations on top of conversation scores. In this work we investigate the feasibility of learning evaluation models without relying on any further annotations besides conversationlevel human ratings. We use a dataset of rated (1-5) open domain spoken conversations between the conversational agent Roving Mind (competing in the Amazon Alexa Prize Challenge 2017) and Amazon Alexa users. First, we assess the complexity of the task by asking two experts to re-annotate a sample of the dataset and observe that the subjectivity of user ratings yields a low upper-bound. Second, through an analysis of the entire dataset we show that automatically extracted features such as user sentiment, Dialogue Acts and conversation length have significant, but low correlation with user ratings. Finally, we report the results of our experiments exploring different combinations of these features to train automatic dialogue evaluation models. Our work suggests that predicting subjective user ratings in open domain conversations is a challenging task.