Evaluation of Mode Collapse in Generative Adversarial Networks

Published: 29 Sept 2024, Last Modified: 23 May 2024OpenReview Archive Direct UploadEveryoneCC BY 4.0
Abstract: Though widely used in imaging tasks, General Adversarial Networks suffer from mode collapse. Various novel Generative Adversarial Network architectures have been proposed to address the issue. However, there exists little work systematically comparing their performance. This work compares state of the art Generative Adversarial Network architectures, in particular AdaGAN, VEEGAN, Wasserstein GAN, and Unrolled GAN, on datasets with different distributions, include synthetic and real datasets and with respect to several commonly used metrics for quantifying mode collapse. Our findings suggest that AdaGAN performs consistently better among the GANs on nearly all datasets and Wassertstein GAN performs poorly on the datasets. Our results also suggest that one metric is not sufficient to quantify mode collapse for GANs as the metrics do not give consistent results
Loading