Revisiting and Benchmarking Graph Autoencoders: A Contrastive Learning Perspective
Keywords: graph autoencoders; masked graph autoencoders; graph contrastive learning
TL;DR: We establish close connections between GAEs and contrastive learning, and propose a new benchmark to demonstrate how contrastive learning principles can be applied to GAEs.
Abstract: Graph autoencoders (GAEs) are self-supervised learning models that can learn meaningful representations of graph-structured data by reconstructing the input graph from a low-dimensional latent space. Over the past few years, GAEs have gained significant attention in academia and industry. In particular, the recent advent of GAEs with masked autoencoding schemes marks a significant advancement in graph self-supervised learning research. While numerous GAEs have been proposed, the underlying mechanisms of GAEs are not well understood, and a comprehensive benchmark for GAEs is still lacking. In this work, we bridge the gap between GAEs and contrastive learning by establishing conceptual and methodological connections. We revisit the GAEs studied in previous works and demonstrate how contrastive learning principles can be applied to GAEs. Motivated by these insights, we introduce lrGAE (left-right GAE), a general and powerful GAE framework that leverages contrastive learning principles to learn meaningful representations. Our proposed lrGAE not only facilitates a deeper understanding of GAEs but also sets a new benchmark for GAEs across diverse graph-based learning tasks. The source code for lrGAE, including the baselines and all the code for reproducing the results, is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/lrGAE/.
Primary Area: learning on graphs and other geometries & topologies
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 8717
Loading