Keywords: Model Evaluation, Amortization, Adaptive Testing
TL;DR: We perform reliable and efficient model-based evaluation by introducing amortized calibration and conditional item generation, validating across 24 NLP benchmarks.
Abstract: Current generative model evaluation procedures are costly and sensitive to test set selection, making continuous monitoring impractical. In this paper, we employ a model-based evaluation framework using Item Response Theory (IRT), which decouples model performance from the test subset selection, ensuring reliable and efficient evaluation. We propose two innovations: amortized calibration to reduce the cost of estimating item parameters of the IRT model and an item generator based on a large language model to automate diverse question generation. Our experiments on 25 common natural language processing benchmarks and 184 language models show that this approach is more reliable and resource-efficient compared to traditional evaluation methods, offering a scalable solution to evaluate generative models.
Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 13698
Loading