System identification of neural systems: If we got it right, would we know?

Yena Han, Tomaso Poggio, Brian Cheung

Keywords: Computational Neuroscience, Neural Networks

Abstract: Various artificial neural networks developed by engineers are now proposed as models of parts of the brain, such as the ventral stream in the primate visual cortex. The network activations are compared to recordings of biological neurons, and good performance in reproducing neural responses is considered to support the model's validity. This system identification approach, however, is only part of the traditional ways to develop and test models in the natural sciences. A key question is how much the ability to predict neural responses tells us. In particular, do these functional tests about neuron activation allow us to distinguish between different model architectures? We benchmark existing techniques to correctly identify a model by replacing brain recordings with known ground truth models. We evaluate the most commonly used identification approaches, such as a linear encoding model and centered kernel alignment. Even in the setting where the correct model is among the candidates, system identification performance is quite variable; it also depends significantly on factors independent of the ground truth architecture, such as stimuli images. In addition, we show the limitations of using functional similarity scores in identifying higher-level architectural motifs.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics

Submission Guidelines: Yes

Please Choose The Closest Area That Your Submission Falls Into: Neuroscience and Cognitive Science (e.g., neural coding, brain-computer interfaces)