What Else Do I Need to Know? The Effect of Background Information on Users’ Reliance on QA Systems

Navita Goyal, Eleftheria Briakou, Amanda Stephanie Liu, Connor Baumler, Claire Bonial, Jeffrey Micher, Clare R. Voss, Marine Carpuat, Hal Daumé III

Submission Type: Regular Long Paper

Submission Track: Human-Centered NLP

Keywords: human-centered NLP, over-reliance, explainability

TL;DR: We conduct a human-study on how users interact with QA systems in the absence of sufficient information to assess their predictions and whether adding the requisite background alleviates the concerns around over-reliance in model predictions.

Abstract: NLP systems have shown impressive performance at answering questions by retrieving relevant context. However, with the increasingly large models, it is impossible and often undesirable to constrain models' knowledge or reasoning to only the retrieved context. This leads to a mismatch between the information that \textit{the models} access to derive the answer and the information that is available to \textit{the user} to assess the model predicted answer. In this work, we study how users interact with QA systems in the absence of sufficient information to assess their predictions. Further, we ask whether adding the requisite background helps mitigate users' over-reliance on predictions. Our study reveals that users rely on model predictions even in the absence of sufficient information needed to assess the model's correctness. Providing the relevant background, however, helps users better catch model errors, reducing over-reliance on incorrect predictions. On the flip side, background information also increases users' confidence in their accurate as well as inaccurate judgments. Our work highlights that supporting users' verification of QA predictions is an important, yet challenging, problem.

Submission Number: 4362