Out-of-Distribution Detection with Negative Prompts
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Keywords: out-of-distribution dection, CLIP, prompt learning
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.
Abstract: Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is indispensable for open-world machine learning models. Inspired by recent success in large pre-trained language-vision models, e.g., CLIP, advanced works have achieved impressive OOD detection results by matching the *similarity* between image features and features of learned prompts, i.e., positive prompts. However, existing works typically struggle with OOD samples having similar features with those of known classes. One straightforward approach is to introduce negative prompts to achieve a *dissimilarity* matching, which further assesses the anomaly level of image features by introducing the absence of specific features. Unfortunately, our experimental observations show that either employing a prompt like "not a photo of a" or learning a prompt to represent "not containing" fails to capture the dissimilarity for identifying OOD samples. The failure may be contributed to the diversity of negative features, i.e., tons of features could indicate features not belonging to a known class. To this end, we propose to learn a set of negative prompts for each class. The learned positive prompt (for all classes) and negative prompts (for each class) are leveraged to measure the similarity and dissimilarity in the feature space simultaneously, enabling more accurate detection of OOD samples. Extensive experiments are conducted on diverse OOD detection benchmarks, showing the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Primary Area: unsupervised, self-supervised, semi-supervised, and supervised representation learning
Submission Number: 1826
Loading