## Minimax Optimality (Probably) Doesn't Imply Distribution Learning for GANs

29 Sept 2021, 00:33 (edited 15 Mar 2022)ICLR 2022 PosterReaders: Everyone
• Keywords: theory of GANs, distribution learning, pseudorandom generators, cryptography
• Abstract: Arguably the most fundamental question in the theory of generative adversarial networks (GANs) is to understand when GANs can actually learn the underlying distribution. Theoretical and empirical evidence (see e.g. Arora-Risteski-Zhang '18) suggest local optimality of the empirical training objective is insufficient, yet it does not rule out the possibility that achieving a true population minimax optimal solution might imply distribution learning. In this paper, we show that standard cryptographic assumptions imply that this stronger condition is still insufficient. Namely, we show that if local pseudorandom generators (PRGs) exist, then for a large family of natural target distributions, there are ReLU network generators of constant depth and poly size which take Gaussian random seeds so that (i) the output is far in Wasserstein distance from the target distribution, but (ii) no polynomially large Lipschitz discriminator ReLU network can detect this. This implies that even achieving a population minimax optimal solution to the Wasserstein GAN objective is likely insufficient for distribution learning. Our techniques reveal a deep connection between GANs and PRGs, which we believe will lead to further insights into the computational landscape of GANs.
• One-sentence Summary: Under the standard crypto assumption that local pseudorandom generators exist, we show that even a global optimizer for the population WGAN objective need not be close to the true distribution.
• Supplementary Material: zip
17 Replies