Diverse Preference Learning for Capabilities and Alignment

ICLR 2025 Conference Submission13501 Authors

28 Sept 2024 (modified: 02 Dec 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: alignment, diversity, natural language processing, reinforcement learning
TL;DR: We identify a cause of diversity loss from RLHF/DPO and propose a simple solution.
Abstract: As LLMs increasingly impact society, their ability to represent diverse perspectives is critical. However, recent studies reveal that alignment algorithms such as RLHF and DPO significantly reduce the diversity of LLM outputs. Not only do aligned LLMs generate text with repetitive structure and word choice, they also approach problems in more uniform ways, and their responses reflect a narrower range of societal perspectives. We attribute this problem to the KL divergence regularizer employed in preference learning algorithms. This causes the model to overweight majority opinions and sacrifice diversity in exchange for optimal reward. To address this, we propose Diverse Preference Learning, which decouples the entropy and cross-entropy terms in the KL penalty — allowing for fine-grained control over LLM generation diversity. From a capabilities perspective, LLMs trained using Diverse Preference Learning attain higher accuracy on difficult repeated sampling tasks and produce outputs with greater semantic and lexical diversity. From an alignment perspective, they are capable of representing a wider range of societal viewpoints and display improved logit calibration. Notably, Diverse Preference Learning resembles, but is a Pareto improvement over standard temperature scaling.
Primary Area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 13501
Loading