Strategies and impact of learning curve estimation for CNN-based image classification

Laura Didyk, Brayden Yarish, Michael Alexander Beck, Christopher Bidinosti, Christopher J Henry

Primary Area: unsupervised, self-supervised, semi-supervised, and supervised representation learning

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Keywords: Learning Curves, Machine Learning, Convolutional Neural Network, Neural Scaling Laws

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

TL;DR: We investigate how to sample the performance of models on small training sets to predict their performance when trained on a much larger full training set.

Abstract: Learning curves are a measure for how the performance of machine learning models improves given a certain volume of training data. Over a wide variety of applications and models it was observed that learning curves follow -- to a large extent -- a power law behavior. This makes the performance of different models for a given task somewhat predictable and opens the opportunity to reduce the training time for practitioners, who are exploring the space of possible models and hyperparameters for the problem at hand. By estimating the learning curve of a model from training on small subsets of data only the best models need to be considered for training on the full dataset. How to choose subset sizes and how often to sample models on these to obtain estimates is however not researched. Given that the goal is to reduce overall training time strategies are needed that sample the performance in a time-efficient way and yet leads to accurate learning curve estimates. In this paper we formulate the framework for these strategies and propose several strategies. Further we evaluate the strategies for simulated learning curves and in experiments with popular datasets and models for image classification tasks.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 4052