Which priors matter? Benchmarking models for learning latent dynamics

Aleksandar Botev, Andrew Jaegle, Peter Wirnsberger, Daniel Hennes, Irina Higgins

TL;DR: Comparison of Physics inspired models on suite of new datasets.

Abstract:

Learning dynamics is at the heart of many important applications of machine learning (ML), such as robotics and autonomous driving. In these settings, ML algorithms typically need to reason about a physical system using high dimensional observations, such as images, without access to the underlying state. Recently, several methods have proposed to integrate priors from classical mechanics into ML models to address the challenge of physical reasoning from images. In this work, we take a sober look at the current capabilities of these models. To this end, we introduce a suite consisting of 17 datasets with visual observations
based on physical systems exhibiting a wide range of dynamics. We conduct a thorough and detailed comparison of the major classes of physically inspired methods alongside several strong baselines. While models that incorporate physical priors can often learn latent spaces with desirable properties, our results demonstrate that these methods fail to significantly improve upon standard techniques. Nonetheless, we find that the use of continuous and time-reversible dynamics benefits models of all classes.

Community Implementations: [ 2 code implementations](https://www.catalyzex.com/paper/arxiv:2111.05458/code)