Keywords: Mutual Information, Variational Methods, Normalizing Flows, Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design
TL;DR: We introduce two new flow-based variational Mutual Information estimations that are comparable in expressiveness to critic-based methods, such as MINE or InfoNCE, but can also approximate large MI
Abstract: Mutual Information (MI) is a fundamental measure of dependence between random variables, but its practical application is limited because it is difficult to calculate in many circumstances. Variational methods offer one approach by introducing an approximate distribution to create various bounds on MI, which in turn is an easier optimization problem to solve. In practice, the variational distribution chosen is often a Gaussian, which is convenient but lacks flexibility in modeling complicated distributions. In this paper, we introduce new classes of variational estimators based on Normalizing Flows that extend the previous Gaussian-based variational estimators. Our new estimators maintain many of the same theoretical guarantees while simultaneously enhancing the expressivity of the variational distribution. We experimentally verify that our new methods are effective on large MI problems where discriminative-based estimators, such as MINE and InfoNCE, are fundamentally limited. Furthermore, we compare against a diverse set of benchmarking tests to show that the flow-based estimators often perform as well, if not better, than the discriminative-based counterparts. Finally, we demonstrate how these estimators can be effectively utilized in the Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design setting for online sequential decision making.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: probabilistic methods (Bayesian methods, variational inference, sampling, UQ, etc.)
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 11672
Loading