Are Language Models Puzzle Prodigies? Algorithmic Puzzles Unveil Serious Challenges in Multimodal ReasoningDownload PDF

Anonymous

16 Feb 2024ACL ARR 2024 February Blind SubmissionReaders: Everyone
Abstract: This paper introduces the novel task of multimodal puzzle solving, framed within the context of visual question-answering. We present a new dataset, AlgoPuzzleVQA designed to challenge and evaluate the capabilities of multimodal language models in solving algorithmic puzzles that necessitate both visual understanding, language understanding, and complex algorithmic reasoning. We create the puzzles to encompass a diverse array of mathematical and algorithmic topics such as boolean logic, combinatorics, graph theory, optimization, search, etc., aiming to evaluate the gap between visual data interpretation and algorithmic problem-solving skills. The dataset is generated automatically from code authored by humans. All our puzzles have exact solutions that can be found from the algorithm without tedious human calculations. It ensures that our dataset can be scaled up arbitrarily in terms of reasoning complexity and dataset size. Our investigation reveals that large language models (LLMs) such as GPT4V and Gemini exhibit limited performance in puzzle-solving tasks. We find that their performance is near random in a multi-choice question-answering setup for a significant number of puzzles. The findings emphasize the challenges of integrating visual, language, and algorithmic knowledge for solving complex reasoning problems.
Paper Type: long
Research Area: Multimodality and Language Grounding to Vision, Robotics and Beyond
Contribution Types: Model analysis & interpretability, Data resources, Data analysis
Languages Studied: English
Preprint Status: We plan to release a non-anonymous preprint in the next two months (i.e., during the reviewing process).
A1: yes
A1 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 6
A2: n/a
A3: yes
A3 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 2, 3, 4, Appendix
B: yes
B1: yes
B1 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 3, 4, Appendix
B2: yes
B2 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 3, 4, Appendix
B3: yes
B3 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 3, 4, Appendix
B4: n/a
B5: yes
B5 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 2, 3
B6: yes
B6 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 3, 4
C: yes
C1: yes
C1 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 4
C2: yes
C2 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 4
C3: yes
C3 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 4
C4: yes
C4 Elaboration For Yes Or No: 4
D: no
D1: n/a
D2: n/a
D3: n/a
D4: n/a
D5: n/a
E: no
E1: n/a
0 Replies

Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview