CHG Shapley: Efficient Data Valuation and Selection towards Trustworthy Machine Learning

Huaiguang Cai

Keywords: Data Valuation, Shapley Value, Data selection

TL;DR: Efficient Data Valuation Method (one training run) and Its Application in Data Selection for Large-Scale Datasets

Abstract: Understanding the decision-making process of machine learning models is crucial for ensuring trustworthy machine learning. Data Shapley, a landmark study on data valuation, advances this understanding by assessing the contribution of each datum to model performance. However, the resource-intensive and time-consuming nature of multiple model retraining poses challenges for applying Data Shapley to large datasets. To address this, we propose the CHG (compound of Hardness and Gradient) utility function, which approximates the utility of each data subset on model performance in every training epoch. By deriving the closed-form Shapley value for each data point using the CHG utility function, we reduce the computational complexity to that of a single model retraining, achieving a quadratic improvement over existing marginal contribution-based methods. We further leverage CHG Shapley for real-time data selection, conducting experiments across three settings: standard datasets, label noise datasets, and class imbalance datasets. These experiments demonstrate its effectiveness in identifying high-value and noisy data. By enabling efficient data valuation, CHG Shapley promotes trustworthy model training through a novel data-centric perspective.

Primary Area: interpretability and explainable AI

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 444