Inverse Game Theory for Stackelberg Games: the Blessing of Bounded RationalityDownload PDF

Published: 31 Oct 2022, 18:00, Last Modified: 11 Jan 2023, 21:40NeurIPS 2022 AcceptReaders: Everyone
Keywords: Stackelberg game, inverse game theory, quantal response, bounded rationality
TL;DR: Provably effective learning of agent utilities from boundedly rational responses in general Stackelberg games
Abstract: Optimizing strategic decisions (a.k.a. computing equilibrium) is key to the success of many non-cooperative multi-agent applications. However, in many real-world situations, we may face the exact opposite of this game-theoretic problem --- instead of prescribing equilibrium of a given game, we may directly observe the agents' equilibrium behaviors but want to infer the underlying parameters of an unknown game. This research question, also known as inverse game theory, has been studied in multiple recent works in the context of Stackelberg games. Unfortunately, existing works exhibit quite negative results, showing statistical hardness and computational hardness, assuming follower's perfectly rational behaviors. Our work relaxes the perfect rationality agent assumption to the classic quantal response model, a more realistic behavior model of bounded rationality. Interestingly, we show that the smooth property brought by such bounded rationality model actually leads to provably more efficient learning of the follower utility parameters in general Stackelberg games. Systematic empirical experiments on synthesized games confirm our theoretical results and further suggest its robustness beyond the strict quantal response model.
Supplementary Material: zip
11 Replies