A comparison between humans and AI at recognizing objects in unusual poses
Abstract: Deep learning is closing the gap with human vision on several object recognition benchmarks. Here we investigate this gap in the context of challenging images where objects are seen in unusual poses. We find that humans excel at recognizing objects in such poses. In contrast, state-of-the-art deep networks for vision (EfficientNet, SWAG, ViT, SWIN, BEiT, ConvNext) and state-of-the-art large vision-language models (Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, GPT-4) are systematically brittle on unusual poses, with the exception of Gemini showing excellent robustness to that condition. As we limit image exposure time, human performance degrades to the level of deep networks, suggesting that additional mental processes (requiring additional time) are necessary to identify objects in unusual poses. An analysis of error patterns of humans vs. networks reveals that even time-limited humans are dissimilar to feed-forward deep networks. In conclusion, our comparison reveals that humans are overall more robust than deep networks and that they rely on different mechanisms for recognizing objects in unusual poses. Understanding the nature of the mental processes taking place during extra viewing time may be key to reproduce the robustness of human vision in silico.
Submission Length: Regular submission (no more than 12 pages of main content)
Assigned Action Editor: ~Andrew_Kyle_Lampinen1
Submission Number: 3528
Loading