Mapping Post-Training Forgetting in Language Models at Scale

Jackson Harmon, Andreas Hochlehnert, Matthias Bethge, Ameya Prabhu

Keywords: continual learning; foundation models; reasoning;

TL;DR: We quantify forgetting of pretraining knowledge during post-training with a simple samplewise forgetting metric -- providing an extensive empirical analysis and open directions for continual learning.

Abstract: Large-scale post‑training now drives many of the largest capability gains in language models (LMs), yet its effect on pretrained knowledge remains poorly understood. Not all forgetting is equal: Forgetting one fact (e.g., a U.S. president or an API call) does not “average out” by recalling another. Hence, we propose a sample-wise paradigm to measure what is forgotten and when backward transfer occurs. Our metric counts 1→0 transitions (correct before post‑training, incorrect after) to quantify forgetting and 0→1 transitions to quantify backward transfer. Traditional task averages conflate these effects and obscure large changes. For multiple‑choice benchmarks, we add chance‑adjusted variants that subtract the expected contribution of random guessing from pre‑ and post‑training accuracies. We apply this framework across post‑training stages, model sizes, and data scales. Our large‑scale analysis shows that: (1) Domain-continual pre-training induces moderate forgetting with low-to-moderate backward transfer; (2) RL/SFT post-training applied to base models and Instruction tuning yields moderate-to-large backward transfer on math and logic with overall low-to-moderate forgetting; (3) Applying RL/SFT to instruction‑tuned models is sensitive on data scale: at small scales, both forgetting and backward transfer are small; at larger scales, effects are mixed and warrant further study with better controls; (4) Model merging does not reliably mitigate forgetting. Overall, our framework offers a practical yardstick for mapping how post‑training alters pre-trained knowledge at scale -- enabling progress towards generally capable AI systems.

Serve As Reviewer: ~Jackson_Harmon1

Submission Number: 20