FroSSL: Frobenius Norm Minimization for Self-Supervised Learning

Oscar Skean, Aayush Dhakal, Nathan Jacobs, Luis Gonzalo Sanchez Giraldo

Primary Area: unsupervised, self-supervised, semi-supervised, and supervised representation learning

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Keywords: self-supervised learning, representation learning, information theory, computer vision

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

TL;DR: We introduce a self-supervised learning objective based on Frobenius norms.

Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) is an increasingly popular paradigm for representation learning. Recent methods can be classified as sample-contrastive, dimension-contrastive, or asymmetric network-based, with each family having its own approach to avoiding informational collapse. While dimension-contrastive methods converge to similar solutions as sample-contrastive methods, it can be empirically shown that some methods require more epochs of training to converge. Motivated by closing this divide, we present the objective function FroSSL which is both sample- and dimension-contrastive up to embedding normalization. FroSSL works by minimizing covariance Frobenius norms for avoiding collapse and minimizing mean-squared error for augmentation invariance. We show that FroSSL converges more quickly than a variety of other SSL methods and provide theoretical and empirical support that this faster convergence is due to how FroSSL affects the eigenvalues of the embedding covariance matrices. We also show that FroSSL learns competitive representations on linear probe evaluation when used to train a ResNet18 on the CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, STL-10, and ImageNet datasets.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 8216