Sub-optimal Experts mitigate Ambiguity in Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Keywords: Inverse Reinforcement Learning, Sub-optimal Experts, Sample Complexity
TL;DR: We study how the presence of multiple and sub-optimal experts can mitigate the ambuigity that affects Inverse Reinforcement Learning.
Abstract: Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) deals with the problem of deducing a reward function that explains the behavior of an expert agent who is assumed to act *optimally* in an underlying unknown task. Recent works have studied the IRL problem from the perspective of recovering the *feasible reward set*, i.e., the class of reward functions that are compatible with a unique optimal expert. However, in several problems of interest it is possible to observe the behavior of multiple experts with different degree of optimality (e.g., racing drivers whose skills ranges from amateurs to professionals). For this reason, in this work, we focus on the reconstruction of the feasible reward set when, in addition to demonstrations from the optimal expert, we observe the behavior of multiple *sub-optimal experts*. Given this problem, we first study the theoretical properties showing that the presence of multiple sub-optimal experts, in addition to the optimal one, can significantly shrink the set of compatible rewards, ultimately mitigating the inherent ambiguity of IRL.
Furthermore, we study the statistical complexity of estimating the feasible reward set with a generative model and analyze a uniform sampling algorithm that turns out to be minimax optimal whenever the sub-optimal experts' performance level is sufficiently close to that of the optimal expert.
Primary Area: Reinforcement learning
Submission Number: 6233
Loading