A Natural Experiment on LLM Data Contamination in Code Generation

NeurIPS 2023 Workshop ICBINB Submission17 Authors

Published: 27 Oct 2023, Last Modified: 01 Dec 2023ICBINB 2023EveryoneRevisionsBibTeX
Keywords: contamination, memorization, llm, codeforces, project euler, datasets, benchmarks, training cutoff
TL;DR: We present the first thorough study of LLM data contamination on datasets released over time, showing that LLMs’ ability to solve coding problems changes dramatically as a function of metrics such as release date and GitHub popularity.
Abstract: Recent claims about the impressive abilities of large language models (LLMs) are often supported by evaluating publicly available benchmarks. Since LLMs train on wide swaths of the internet, this practice raises concerns of data contamination, i.e., evaluating on examples that are explicitly or implicitly included in the training data. Data contamination remains notoriously challenging to measure and mitigate, even with partial attempts like controlled experimentation of training data, canary strings, or embedding similarities. In this work, we conduct the first thorough longitudinal analysis of data contamination in LLMs by using the natural experiment of training cutoffs in GPT models to look at benchmarks released over time. Specifically, we consider two code/mathematical problem-solving datasets, Codeforces and Project Euler, and find statistically significant trends among LLM pass rate vs. GitHub popularity and release date that provide strong evidence of contamination. By open-sourcing our dataset, raw results, and evaluation framework, our work paves the way for rigorous analyses of data contamination in modern models. We conclude with a discussion of best practices and future steps for publicly releasing benchmarks in the age of LLMs that train on webscale data.
Submission Number: 17