Insufficient Task Description can Impair In-context Learning: A Study from Information Perspective

26 Sept 2024 (modified: 18 Dec 2024)ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: in-context learning
Abstract: Transformers have demonstrated remarkable performance in a wide range of applications, making in-context learning an essential technique. In-context learning primarily relies on two types of information: in-context examples and task description. While previous research has extensively investigated the influence of in-context examples on learning behavior, the role of task description has not been adequately explored, despite their practical significance. In this paper, we present a study examining the impact of task description on the in-context learning performance of transformers. We devise a synthetic experiment setting, making the information of task description controllable. Through a series of well-designed experiments, we systematically vary task description information and assess the resulting effects on model performance across multiple tasks. Our findings reveal the double-side roles of task description: insufficient task description will lead the model to ignore in-context examples, resulting a poor in-context performance; once the information in task description surpasses a certain threshold, the impact of task description transfers from negative to positive, and a performance emergence can be observed. We further conduct the tasks on GPT-4 and observe a similar double-side impact. In conclusion, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the in-context learning from a task description perspective.
Primary Area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5607
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview