Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?Download PDF

21 May 2021, 20:45 (edited 03 Nov 2021)NeurIPS 2021 PosterReaders: Everyone
  • Keywords: transfer learning, representational similarity, class separation, training objectives, classification, supervised learning, label smoothing, dropout, centered kernel alignment
  • TL;DR: We show that many loss functions and regularizers that improve ImageNet accuracy lead to features that transfer worse to other tasks, and connect this phenomenon to an increase in class separation in the penultimate layer of the network
  • Abstract: Previous work has proposed many new loss functions and regularizers that improve test accuracy on image classification tasks. However, it is not clear whether these loss functions learn better representations for downstream tasks. This paper studies how the choice of training objective affects the transferability of the hidden representations of convolutional neural networks trained on ImageNet. We show that many objectives lead to statistically significant improvements in ImageNet accuracy over vanilla softmax cross-entropy, but the resulting fixed feature extractors transfer substantially worse to downstream tasks, and the choice of loss has little effect when networks are fully fine-tuned on the new tasks. Using centered kernel alignment to measure similarity between hidden representations of networks, we find that differences among loss functions are apparent only in the last few layers of the network. We delve deeper into representations of the penultimate layer, finding that different objectives and hyperparameter combinations lead to dramatically different levels of class separation. Representations with higher class separation obtain higher accuracy on the original task, but their features are less useful for downstream tasks. Our results suggest there exists a trade-off between learning invariant features for the original task and features relevant for transfer tasks.
  • Supplementary Material: pdf
  • Code Of Conduct: I certify that all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the NeurIPS Statement on Ethics, Fairness, Inclusivity, and Code of Conduct.
16 Replies

Loading