Keywords: RLHF, Diffusion models, Direct preference optimization
TL;DR: We propose a new preference optimization framework tailored for aligning different models with human preference.
Abstract: The direct preference optimization (DPO) method has shown success in aligning text-to-image diffusion models with human preference.
Previous approaches typically assume a consistent preference label between final generated images and their corresponding noisy samples at intermediate steps, and directly apply DPO to these noisy samples for fine-tuning. However, we identify a significant issue with this consistency assumption, as directly applying DPO to noisy samples from different generation trajectories based on final preference order may disrupt the optimization process. We first demonstrate the issues inherent in previous methods from two perspectives: *gradient direction* and *preference order*, and then propose a **Tailor**ed **P**reference **O**ptimization (TailorPO) framework for aligning diffusion models with human preference, underpinned by some theoretical insights. Our approach directly ranks the preference order of intermediate noisy samples based on their step-wise reward, and effectively resolves the optimization direction issues through a simple yet efficient design. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider the distinct structure of diffusion models and leverage the gradient guidance in preference aligning to enhance the optimization effectiveness. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the model's ability to generate aesthetically pleasing and human-preferred images.
Primary Area: generative models
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 1717
Loading